Why Are Pluto’s Moons So Weird?

Pluto true color NH 7-15-15
Approximate natural-color image of Pluto made from data captured by New Horizons on July 15, 2015. (NASA/JHUAPL/SwRI/Jason Major)

Whether you call it a planet, a dwarf planet, or a Kuiper Belt or Trans-Neptunian Object—or all of the above—there’s no denying that Pluto and its family of moons are true curiosities in the Solar System. Not only does little Pluto have one moon, Charon, that’s so massive in comparison that they both orbit each other around a point outside the radius of either, but it also has four other smaller moons in orbit that break the general rules of how moons are “supposed to” behave.


In our Solar System — and very likely in other systems too — most natural satellites are tidally locked to planets, meaning that over time they have settled into a rotation that keeps the same face always aimed toward their host planet as they orbit.

How the Moon’s tidal locking still involves rotation over the course of its 27.3-day sidereal orbit. The left side shows the Moon as it is with one face always aimed at Earth, the right shows what would happen if it did not rotate at all. (By Stigmatella aurantiaca. CC by SA 3.0/Wikipedia)

Our Moon behaves this way, as do the moons of Mars and most of the moons of the gas and ice giants (with the exception of some very small and far-orbiting moons, like Saturn’s Phoebe.)

Pluto’s largest moon Charon does this — and in fact Pluto and Charon are tidally locked to each other. If you were to stand on Pluto in sight of Charon it would always be in the same place in the sky as it went through its phases and the background stars passed behind; if you were on Charon, likewise with Pluto. (And if you stood on either in a place where the other wasn’t visible, you’d literally never see the other.)

Pluto’s 1,212-km (753 mile) -wide moon Charon imaged in natural color by New Horizons on July 14, 2015. Credit: NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research Institute.
Artist’s impression (pre-New Horizons) of Pluto’s surface with Charon in its permanent spot in the sky. (Credit: NASA)

But Pluto’s four wee moons — Nix, Hydra, Kerberos, and Styx, all of which were discovered between 2005 and 2012 — don’t rotate like that. Instead they each have their own rotation rates and resonances, none of which are in tidal lock with Pluto. They tumble through space more like asteroids or comets than moons, causing scientists to wonder why and how they got that way.

In fact Pluto’s outermost moon, Hydra, is very not-tidally-locked…it rotates 89 times on its axis for every one time it orbits Pluto!

It’s thought that the gravitational torque from the relatively enormous Charon is responsible for the unsettled movements of Pluto’s smaller moons. Read more here.

Want to know more? Watch a video below from NASA’s New Horizons team featuring spaceflight historian and author Amy Shira Teitel:

Learn more about Pluto, its moons, and the New Horizons mission here.


  1. Stormwise says:

    A good article about a really fascinating topic 🙂 What I found myself liking most about this was trying to wrap my mind around what the space around two, almost equally shallow gravity wells might look like when they lock themselves in a tight orbit with one another. Could such a thing generate a wave of sorts, that might have ejected some of the smaller satellites / debris out of the binary orbit of Pluto and Charon, while causing the remaining four smaller moons to have such unusual spins and wobbles? The problem I have with the theory that debris coalesced into the current moons (after the impact that is thought to have formed Charon), is that at least to my mind, were that the case, they should be as round as Charon.

    Also, I think the choice for Ms. Teitel as an embedded journalist for the New Horizons team was a smart one … she is clear and engaging, and I think she comes across in a way that would allow many in the general public to feel her enthusiasm about space and science. I think this is becoming more important, as the space projects increase in their scope and cost, because the budgets that sustain these projects are influenced by the priority the general public is willing to place on them. This is why I think blogs like yours are also just as important, and am grateful you take the time out of your schedule to post here – I don’t often watch YouTube; but I will generally find the time to read one of your articles, especially since I often learn something new when I do!


Comments are closed.